DISASTER RESPONDERS SAY ENDING FEMA WOULD MOVE TASKS AND COSTS TO STATES, LOCAL GOVERNMENTS

LINCOLN- President Donald Trump’s call to possibly eliminate the Federal Emergency Management Agency has Nebraska officials waiting and worrying, with two former disaster response officials saying that doing away with FEMA would leave a void that would prove difficult to fill. “If they do away with FEMA, Nebraska would be in a world of hurt,” said Al Berndt, a former assistant director who managed the Nebraska Emergency Management Agency on a day-to-day basis for 14 years until 2014. “We just didn’t have the people to do what FEMA does.”

That sentiment was echoed by Dave Maurstad, a former Nebraska lieutenant governor who went on to serve 15 years as a top FEMA administrator, visiting dozens of disaster sites, from Hurricane Katrina to the tornado that ripped through Joplin, Missouri. Maurstad, who retired in July, said it’s certainly appropriate to review FEMA and see if federal disaster response might be streamlined. But, he said, with the increase in severity and frequency of natural catastrophes such as floods, hurricanes, and wildfires, someone has to coordinate the response of the 27 federal agencies that provide help.

For the full article click HERE